Buyer-side tax read for lower middle market acquisitions

The QoE tests the earnings.
Nobody reads the returns with a buyer's eye.

A fixed-scope review of the target's tax filings, sorted into what's verified, what's assumed, and what needs a specialist before the purchase agreement hardens.

The gap

Tax exposure doesn't show up in EBITDA. It shows up after close.

A Quality of Earnings tells you whether the numbers are real. It usually doesn't tell you whether the seller owes sales tax in eleven states, whether the S election was valid in the first place, or whether half the crew should have been on W-2s.

On deals under $10M, a full tax diligence engagement from a national firm often costs more than the deal can carry, so the axis gets skipped. The seller's CPA has a good answer for every question. The buyer has nobody reading the filings.

The Tax Exposure Review is that read. The difference is scope, not rank: it sits beside your QoE and your attorneys, and it points to them where a finding needs their seat.

What it reads

Three years of filings, read for what a buyer inherits.

  • Sales and use tax nexusEconomic nexus since Wayfair means remote sales can create filing obligations the seller never registered for. In a stock deal, that liability transfers.
  • Entity and electionS corporation eligibility, second-class-of-stock issues, and reasonable compensation. A broken election can cost the step-up you priced in.
  • Payroll and worker classification941s and W-2s against the 1099 roster. Misclassification is a common, quiet, and expensive inherited problem.
  • Returns against the booksWhere the filed returns and the financials the QoE relied on disagree, and whether the seller can explain why.
  • Notices and open yearsIRS and state correspondence, payment plans, amended returns, and which years remain open to examination.
  • Structure and allocationAsset vs. stock, and how a proposed purchase price allocation (Form 8594) plays out for the buyer after the deal.

The deliverable

Every finding lands in one of three columns.

This is the Known vs. Assumed discipline applied to tax. The deliverable doesn't hand back a pile of observations. It tells you what you can rely on, what you're taking on faith, and who needs to look next.

Verified

Supported by the filings and records provided. You can rely on it at the table.

Payroll deposits reconcile to 941s across all twelve quarters.
Assumed

Plausible, but resting on the seller's word or a document not yet produced. Named so it can be asked for or priced.

"We don't sell enough out of state to matter." No state-by-state sales breakdown provided.
Refer

Needs a CPA, a tax attorney, or your QoE provider. Stated plainly, with the question they should answer.

Possible second class of stock from non-pro-rata distributions in 2024. Refer to tax counsel before structuring.

Why now

Allocation stopped being a closing-day formality.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made 100% bonus depreciation permanent for qualified property acquired after January 19, 2025. In an asset deal, that gives buyers a reason to push more of the price toward equipment and other qualifying assets, and it makes the allocation a negotiating point worth reading early.

States don't all follow the federal rule, so the same allocation can look different on the state return. The review flags where the allocation in the LOI or draft agreement leaves value on the table, and refers the modeling to your CPA.

Kaufman Rossin, "One year of OBBBA: What we are seeing in mid-market deals"; Kutak Rock client alert, July 2025; Sikich on state conformity.

What it isn't

Not a tax opinion, not legal advice, and not a substitute for your CPA or attorney. It's a buyer's read of the record, built to tell you which questions to put to them and how much those answers matter.

It doesn't prepare or amend returns, and it holds no position in whether the deal closes.

Who reads it

Daniel N. Harris has prepared more than 700 individual and small business returns since 2005, at Liberty Tax and in independent practice, and completes the IRS Annual Filing Season Program each year. That's two decades of adversarial document review, where a missed inconsistency compounds and "we assumed" is not an accepted answer.

His doctoral research at Case Western Reserve's Weatherhead School of Management studies how lower middle market buyers misjudge deals. The Tax Exposure Review points both at the target's filings.

The engagement

One axis. One fee. One date.

The Tax Exposure Review runs as a Single-Axis QoD on the tax axis, with the same method, depth, and fee structure as every Decision Signal engagement.

The fee is one fixed number, set from the deal value you state, and confirmed in writing before intake opens. No hourly meter, no success fee, and the fee is the same whether you close or walk.

It also folds into a QoD Sprint as one of the axes, when tax is one of several things keeping you up.

Starting at$3,500
Deal size$1M to $10M enterprise value
Records needed3 years federal, state, sales tax, and payroll filings; IRS and state notices
DeliveryWithin 5 business days of complete intake and payment
Best timingBefore the LOI is signed, or early in exclusivity
IntakeSecure client portal, AES-256 encrypted
Fee schedule2026. Subject to change without notice; the fee confirmed in writing at engagement governs.

Find out what the returns say while it can still change the price.

Send the deal size and where you are in the process. You'll get a fee and a delivery date back in writing.

Not in a live deal yet? The Known vs. Assumed Ledger is free with the Decision Signal Journal.